How do I Use Veo 3?
- JOYAL JOHNSON
- Jan 5
- 2 min read
Veo 3 is Google’s advanced generative video model for creating high-quality clips—especially cinematic, film-style visuals.
The biggest difference between “random AI video” and something that actually feels directed is the prompt. So I don’t prompt Veo 3 casually—I prompt it like a shot list.
This is the system I use every time.
What I Use Veo 3 For
I mainly use Veo 3 for video generation—short cinematic sequences and concept visuals for content. The goal is simple: generate clips that look intentional, consistent, and usable with minimal fixing.
The Non-Negotiables I Always Include
1) Aspect ratio (first line)
I always state the output ratio upfront because it changes framing, composition, and how the subject reads.
9:16 for Reels/Shorts/Stories
16:9 for YouTube / cinematic landscape
2) Duration (seconds, always)
I choose the duration intentionally (not “whatever it gives”).
Common picks: 5s / 6s / 8s
Short enough to stay consistent, long enough for a real “shot.”
3) Audio (explicit)
If audio matters, I specify what kind.
None (clean visual only)
Ambient (rain, city hum, wind)
SFX (whoosh, footsteps, door close)
Dialogue (rare—only if needed)
Veo 3 supports native audio generation in supported flows, so it’s worth calling out when you want it.
Crisp and Clear Prompting: I Write “Shot Prompts”
My prompts read like a director’s brief—tight, specific, no fluff.
What I always define:
Subject details: who/what, clothing/texture, emotion, what must be in focus
Foreground + background: what exists close to camera vs far away
Lighting: soft daylight / golden hour / low-key cinematic / neon night
Depth of field: shallow bokeh vs deep focus
Camera language: shot type, lens look, and camera movement
Minor movements: blink, breath, fabric sway, wind, particles—small realism cues
Those micro-movements are important. They make the clip feel alive without turning it chaotic.
Negative Prompting (So It Doesn’t Get Weird)
Negative prompting is part of every Veo 3 prompt I write.
I tell it what to avoid—because in generative video, “what you don’t want” is just as important as what you do want.
My common “avoid” list includes:
text/subtitles/logos/watermarks
oversaturated HDR look
flicker, jitter, shaky camera
warped faces/hands
random object changes or scene morphing
unnatural physics
heavy motion blur
This alone improves consistency a lot.
How I Iterate (Without Losing the Look)
Instead of rewriting everything, I lock the style and change one thing at a time:
“Keep everything the same, change only the lighting to golden hour.”
“Keep the same framing, change only the subject outfit.”
“Keep the same scene, reduce saturation and remove HDR look.”
That “change only X” approach keeps the aesthetic stable and makes iteration efficient.
Why This Works
Veo 3 is high quality, but generative video is still compute-heavy and consistency takes iteration.
This shot-prompt system makes the model behave more like a production tool:
clear output constraints (ratio, duration, audio)
clear visual direction (lighting, DoF, camera)
guardrails (negative prompts)
controlled iteration (change-only-X)
Wrap-Up
I use Veo 3 for video generation, but the real secret is the prompting system: aspect ratio + duration + audio + shot direction + negative prompts + micro-movements.
That’s how you go from “AI clip” to something that feels like a real shot.


Comments